As fans of this blog may remember, I have a fondness for college football as a sport and for gambling as a subject of intellectual fascination. To combine these two personal interests into yet another long and rambling post by the Cap’n, I wrote a column last year that predicted the outcome of all the bowl games based on an arbitrary method. The basic concept is that while having a prediction (and maybe something else) on the line when you watch a game may bring an extra thrill, but you should never believe that any gambling system is going to be any more sensible or reliable than comparing fight songs. Since I’ve already contemplated the musical offerings of many of the teams in this year’s bowl games, I decided to stretch out and find a new means of judging the value of two teams that has no real relation to how well they actually play. For this bowl season the accuracy of prognostication will depend on how well I can analyze the relative strengths and weakness of the opponents’ stadiums. I chose this method because the many unique stadiums are one of distinguishing features that make college football such a special sport. The outstanding assortment of sizes, styles, and structural details make each home field an intense gameday atmosphere. Also, I’ve found myself relishing some of the pairings this bowl season more for the stadiums they offer up for contemplation then the inevitably unentertaining game they will offer for viewing. So once again I invite you to enjoy my insights as a topic for holiday party conversation and remind you to only gamble responsibly (which is to say not with money), as I present by Arbitrary Bowl Predictions!
Part 1
Qualcomm Stadium
December 19, 2006, ESPN2
Mountain West vs. at-large
Bowl Matchup: TCU vs.
The Stadiums: The bowl season starts with the always underrated Poinsetta Bowl, brought to us this year by the kind folks of the San Diego County Credit Union. I don’t have a real problem with sponsors inserting their names into the bowl game’s title –that’s just part of living in a capitalistic society where college football is big business. However, couldn’t we please get some sort of gentlemen’s agreement that sponsors can’t have names longer than the bowl’s themselves, or at least a four syllable cap. Please just to save us all a little time. I’m worried one of these days Brent Musberger is going to pass out us welcoming us to “The Rose Bowl brought to you by Daimler-Chrysler Five-Star Automotive Dealership and
Our first two stadiums are befitting two mid-major teams for whom making a bowl is and accomplishment. On one side of the country you have
Hundreds of miles away the Huskie Stadium stands as the football palace for
The Game: I imagine both teams will represent themselves well in this game. The deciding factor in my analysis is that Huskie stadium makes better use of it’s limited capacity to intimidate the visiting team. This suggests a well designed offense scheme that will allow the stars of NIU to make big plays and nearly outscore the fearsome horned frogs.
The Prediction: NIU- 27 TCU- 21
Sam Boyd Stadium
December 21, 2006, ESPN
Pac 10 No. 4 vs. Mountain West No. 1
Bowl Matchup:
The Stadiums: The best part of doing these arbitrary prediction methods is that often the match-up brought on through the artifice of comparing items like fight songs, mascots, or stadiums, are often much more exciting than the actual on the field competition. In this instance the football game pairs a highly effective and stunningly underexposed Brigham Young team against a mostly uninspired team of Oregon Ducks, who have been a bit of a disappointment ever since their team started struggling mid-way through the season. So traditional football analysts would have you believe that this is likely going to be a blow out victory for the BYU Cougars. Of course none of them will consider how evenly the two teams’ stadiums compare to each other. Few people could imagine that LaVell Edwards Stadium, home of the BYU Cougars, and Autzen Stadium, home of the Oregon Ducks, have anything in common outside of hosting college football games. Let’s just look at the facts. Both teams play at the largest stadiums in their state. Both stadiums seem designed to get as many fans as possible close to field level so their cheers can have maximum impact. Both stadiums were funded in part by shadowing organizations few people understand and many distrust (for Brigham Young it’s the Mormons, for
The Game: It comes down to a few key factors. Autzen Stadium has the sleeker, more modern, more aesthetically pleasing design, implying a superior offensive scheme. However LaVell Edwards stadium has more seating suggesting a stronger overall team. It also conveys a sense of tradition and grandeur which shows a definite edge in terms of the teams fighting spirit and mental toughness. The Cougars will win this one easily.
The Prediction: BYU- 31
New Orleans Bowl
New Orleans, LA
Louisiana Superdome
December 22, 2006, ESPN
Sun Belt vs. Conference USA
Bowl Matchup: Troy vs. Rice
The Stadiums: WHOOO-HOOOOOOO! The New Orleans Bowl is back in Nah’Ohlens! You can bet the coverage will make almost as much of the “It’s just great the city of New Orleans can host events like this again” storyline as much as the “These teams have both accomplished a lot to play in this bowl” storyline. The comparison of the stadiums is pretty one-sided. Rice Stadium has nearly twice as many seats as Troy Memorial Stadium. Visitors to
The Game: Much like the comparison of the stadiums I predict this will be a largely lopsided affair. Troy will play well for a quarter and a half as befitting a team who scraped together a winning season from out of the decidedly worst conference in college football. However the Owls of Rice will show that they have an underestimated team on the rise out in Conference
The Prediction: Rice- 42
University Stadium
December 23, 2006,
Bowl Matchup:
The Stadiums: While these “Location” Bowls may not have the colorful titles of their more famous brethren, but I always appreciated being told up front and center where the game is being played. Some of these lower tier bowl games are actually played at college stadiums, giving some teams a chance to actually play at home. The fact that
Contrasting that Spartan Stadium’s 26,000 seats are arranged in a full circle around the field with the stands rising in supple curves when necessary to accommodate more of the Spartan faithful. Spartan Stadiums actually reminds me of those tight little gyms where small college basketball teams play. When those basketball teams pack the stands with impassioned fans, as
The Game: Watch for
The Prediction:
Papajohns.com Bowl
Legion Field
December 23, 2006, ESPN2
Conference
Bowl Matchup: East Carolina vs. South Florida
The Stadiums: No, I’m not surprised that the Papa John’s website managed to pony up the cash to get a bowl game named after them, see my above statement about living in a capitalistic society and college football being big business (actually, no need to revisit that passage since I managed to pretty much repeat it verbatim). I am surprised by the fact that the Papa John’s corporate bosses couldn’t swing getting the game in Louisville, Kentucky where they already have the University of Louisville stadium in there name. I realize you may be risking poor weather, but surely
The comparison of the stadiums actually isn’t that fun. Sure I like looking at
The Game: I’ll give
The Prediction: East Carolina- 27
Armed Forces Bowl
Amon G. Carter Stadium
December 23, 2006,
Bowl Matchup:
The Stadiums: This game is scheduled to start at 8pm Easter time, and I can’t figure out why. I don’t believe these teams have much pull east of the
The Game:
The Prediction:
Aloha Stadium
December 24, 2006, ESPN
Pac 10 vs. WAC
Bowl Matchup:
The Stadiums: Once again we have a bowl game being played at one of the teams home stadiums (largely by design, because where else are the Warriors of Hawai’i going to draw a sizable crowd, I’m not saying their bad, I’m just saying it’s hard to convince Hawai’i residents to travel to the Mainland in the winter time). This game also provides another underrated match-up between two lightly considered teams, but two powerhouses of stadiums. In favor of
The Game: After weighing several factors, I ultimately made my decision on which stadium best captured the overall spirit of the team. While Sun Devil Stadium is festive and colorful, Aloha Stadium has a unique flavor and feel that could only ever truly work for the Warriors. I say that, plus the fact that
The Prediction:
Ford Field
December 26, 2006, ESPN
MAC vs. Big Ten No. 7
Bowl Matchup: Central Michigan vs. Middle
The Stadiums: When was the last time you ever seriously considered anything remotely connected to these schools, let alone spent a significant amount of time considering their home stadiums? That’s just one more demonstration of all them fun you can have with an arbitrary prediction method. Johny “Red” Flyod Stadium in
The Game: While I normally find overly open designs like the one seen at Kelly Shorts stadium dull and unsatisfying, here I find it to be an advantage. The odd angles of Floyd Stadium concern me. I interpret them to mean the MTSU coaches will be obtuse in approaching the game, and bring their player’s in sadly unprepared for the team they face. Kelly Shorts Stadium (I assume by now you’ve all looked it up, and know I’m not making that name up) with its simple design suggests that the CMU coaches will keep it basic. Their meat and potato play calling will prove the decisive factor, in a game few will find memorable. Plus, how can you root against a stadium called Kelly Shorts!?
The Prediction: Central Michigan- 23
Emerald Bowl
December 27, 2006, ESPN
ACC No. 7 vs. Pac 10 No. 5
Bowl Matchup:
The Stadiums: Many dismiss lower tier bowl games as a callous attempt by colleges, sponsors, and host stadiums to try and score some easy money by pitting two mediocre teams that most people don’t really care to see play another game against each other in a location few would take a winter holiday to if they weren’t forced to out of loyalty to team and school. They are pretty much right about that. However these bowl critics miss out on the chance to enjoy the little details these games present.
Let’s start with the fact that it is a fairly rare occurrence for an ACC and a Pac 10 team to play each other as is. Combine that with the fact that you’ll rarely find
The Game: I realize Doak Walker is great, and I imagine the Seminoles will put up a good fight. But this is the Rose Bowl we’re talking about. The frikkin’ ROSE BOWL!
The Prediction: UCLA- 38
December 27, 2006, ESPN
Big 12 No. 7 vs. SEC No. 8
Bowl Matchup:
The Stadiums: There’s an interesting storyline lurking in the subtext of this game for both universities, and, intriguingly enough, it’s pretty much the same story for both schools. The basic question being asked is how much influence a single person can have on a football program. I notice this because both these schools have a stadium named for a man who either has placed or is placing his permanent mark on football at his respective university.
Down south the shadow over the program isn’t being cast in the present, rather it’s extending out of the past. The Bryant in
The Game: It comes downn to a few simple factors. Since both stadiums represent the essence of the program well, we have to compare some more nuanced details. The fact that Bryant-Denny has almost twice as many seats as Boone Pickens is a big advantage. Also let’s consider the psychological effect for the OSU Cowboys of playing in a stadium named for a man who essentially serves as their rich, eccentric uncle. They may have a fun, free-wheeling atmosphere by the comfort and sense of entitlement it breeds probably sucks some of their drive and hunger. I’ll bet the Tide come in with a little more motivation and fight, and prove that other coaches can succeed in the house Bear built.
The Prediction:
Holiday Bowl
Qualcomm Stadium
December 28, 2006, ESPN
Pac 10 No. 2 vs. Big 12 No. 3
Bowl Matchup:
The Stadiums: Some sports teams take on a personality based largely in relationship to other teams. For some teams like Alabama-Auburn the relationship defines both schools as the hated rival of the other. In cases like Cal and A&M the schools are best known as the second-fiddle to another major college football paper in their own state. The
Texas A&M stuffed themselves full of traditions. So many traditions that they could cut out half and still have more college football related rituals than most schools. Included in this is the astounding Kyle Field. The stadium looks like an architectural wonder with its multiple decks of seats stacking up into the sky. Not only are their mountains of fans on all sides of the field, but they also are famous for shouting louder than any other fan base in the country, so much so they stand literally shake from all the activity.
The Game: Few things are as obvious in stadium analysis as the observation that stadiums that sway with the crowds are likely home to teams prone to shaky performances, a serious problem with Texas A&M. Of course that does not outweigh the overall grandeur of Kyle Field, especially when compared to the simple adequacy of
The Prediction:
Reliant Stadium
December 28, 2006, NFL Network
Big 12 vs. Big East
Bowl Matchup:
The Stadiums: These two schools may actually represent two different chapters in the same story. One school,
The Game: KSU’s stadium is technically proficient, but it lacks soul. I expect the team to execute their plays well, but not to play with lots of passion. Rutgers Stadium is modest and low key, but it seems to capture perfectly the spirit of the little team that could.
The Prediction: Rutgers- 23
Champs Sports Bowl
Florida Citrus Bowl
December 29, 2006, ESPN
Big Ten No. 4 or 5 vs. ACC No. 4
Bowl Matchup: Purdue vs. Maryland
The Stadiums:
Purdue’s Ross-Ade Stadium is just on another level. The stands of a glittering gold, they have a fake train to sound its horn after every home team scorn. It is just the kind of glittering jewel that almost demands your attendance and makes college football in the
The Game: The above analysis leaves little doubt about the outcome of this game. It may be fun to watch and it may look even, but Purdue will be in control the whole time and will eventually pull away from
The Prediction: Purdue- 35
The Coliseum
December 29, 2006, ESPN
SEC vs. ACC No. 5
Bowl Matchup:
The Stadiums: The pairing of stadiums here lacks much excitement. Clemson’s Memorial Stadium has the clear advantage. The way the field sits just beneath ground level surrounded by the stands only focus’s the fans passion even better. Plus when you consider all the famous accoutrements Clemson has built up around their stadium, it seems like any stadium would have a tough time matching up. The only think that I can really say about
The Game: It should be pretty obvious. And know I’m not going to tell you what the other two commonwealths are; you have to look them up yourself.
The Prediction: Clemson- 28
No comments:
Post a Comment